Field manual — Tools 13–18
Twenty-four printable tools
Tool 13 · Unit Economics & Growth-Readiness Calculator
conUse this to learn whether each additional unit creates contribution, sumes capacity, and returns acquisition cash soon enough for your situation.
Shared header
| Owner | Entity / project | Version | As-of date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence links or docu | |||
| ment locations | Last review Next | review | Input legend used □ F □ A □ Fc |
Purpose and when to use
Complete by product, customer segment, channel, and acquisition cohort before scaling spend or capacity. First define the unit—a paid order, retained customer-month, project, seat, transaction, or another economically coherent event. A blended average can hide an unprofitable segment. Cash timing belongs in Tool 14; accounting close in Tool 15.
Unit and cohort definition
| Field | Definition / evidence | F / A / Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Economic unit | ||
| Segment / product / channel | ||
| Cohort entry event and dates | ||
| Revenue recognition versus cash collection | ||
| Variable-cost rule | ||
| Shared-cost allocation—shown separately | ||
| Retention / repeat event |
Per-unit contribution bridge
| Per unit for period ______ | ₹ Basis / source |
|---|---|
| Gross billed amount | |
| Less taxes collected for government | |
| Less discounts, credits, and refunds | |
| Net unit revenue | |
| Less variable product / fulfilment cost | |
| Less variable service / support labour | |
| Less transaction, shipping, and usage cost | |
| Contribution before acquisition | |
| Less attributable acquisition cost per new customer | |
| First-period contribution after acquisition |
Acquisition, retention, and capacity
| Metric | Current cohort | Prior cohort Definition / evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Eligible prospects / leads | ||
| New paying customers | ||
| Attributable acquisition spend ₹ | ||
| Customers active at period start | ||
| Customers retained / repeated | ||
| Contribution per retained period ₹ | ||
| Founder or scarce hours per unit | ||
| Defects, refunds, or rework per unit | ||
| Maximum units at current constraint |
Formulas
- • Contribution per unit = net unit revenue − variable cost caused by that unit.
- • Contribution margin = contribution per unit ÷ net unit revenue.
- • Customer acquisition cost = attributable acquisition spend ÷ new customers attributable to that spend.
- • Period retention = comparable customers retained at period end ÷ comparable customers active at period start.
- • Simple contribution LTV = expected contribution per retained period × expected retained periods, only when the retention process is supportable and costs do not change materially.
- • Contribution payback periods = acquisition cost ÷ contribution per retained period.
- • Operating break-even units = relevant fixed operating cost ÷ contribution per unit. If contribution is non-positive, break-even is undefined.
Growth-readiness gate
| Gate | Evidence Ready / not ready / unknown |
|---|---|
| Unit contribution is positive under a consistent definition | |
| Retention or repeat behavior is observed, not merely assumed | |
| Acquisition attribution is credible | |
| Cash is collected before liquidity becomes dangerous | |
| Quality, safety, and customer outcomes hold with volume | |
| A named constraint can absorb the planned increase | |
| Concentration and platform dependency remain acceptable | |
| Downside and stop trigger are pre-agreed |
Cautions, decision output, and cadence
collecDo not use revenue in the numerator and contribution in the comparison denominator. Taxes ted are not revenue. Founder labour is not free; show scarce hours even when it is not booked as payroll. LTV:CAC and payback have no universal good value: timing, uncertainty, gross contribution, working capital, churn, concentration, and the cost of capital determine what survives.
Choose scale carefully; fix price; reduce variable cost; improve retention; change channel; remove the constraint; stop the unit; or collect another cohort. Review monthly and by cohort; rerun before a large spend, hiring, capacity, or pricing commitment.
Shared footer
| Close the loop | Entry |
|---|---|
| Decision | |
| Action | |
| Action owner | |
| Due date | |
| Proof required | |
| Professional reviewer / review date |
Professional review flag: Have the CA or finance owner approve revenue, tax, variable-cost, acquisition, and shared-cost definitions before using the result for financing, compensation, or public claims. Verify current tax and accounting treatment from authoritative sources.
· TABLE p. 24 · TABLE p. 50 · SALES p. 33 · EF pp. 26–27 · EF pp. 84–91 · RM pp. 112–124. Contribution, acquisition, retention, break-even, and growth-gate mechanics consolidated; universal ratio targets rejected.
Tool 14 · Thirteen-Week Cash, Working-Capital & Runway Forecast
Use this weekly. Profit can be present while payroll cash is absent; forecast receipts customer by customer and payments obligation by obligation.
Shared header
| Owner | Entity / project | Version | As-of date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence links or docu | |||
| ment locations | Last review Next | review | Input legend used □ F □ A □ Fc |
Purpose and when to use
Update from bank data and named invoices every week. The forecast answers whether unrestricted cash stays above the organization’s chosen protection floor for thirteen weeks and which collection, payment, cost, or funding action must occur first. It is not the income statement and should not be filled from an annual budget without timing evidence.
Cash available now
| Cash position as of ______ | ₹ Evidence / restriction |
|---|---|
| Bank cash reconciled | |
| Cash equivalents actually accessible | |
| Less tax / statutory reserve | |
| Less customer-purpose or restricted cash | |
| Less already-committed payroll / critical payments | |
| Uncommitted operating cash | |
| Board / owner chosen minimum cash floor |
Receipt schedule—name the counterparty
| Customer / source Invoice or event | Confidence basis / Gross ₹ Expected week owner |
|---|
Payment schedule—name the obligation
| Due / con | Owner / lawful ac |
|---|---|
| Payee / obligation sequence Committed ₹ Expected week | tion |
Thirteen-week summary
Keep confirmed receipts separate from scenario receipts. Closing cash in one week becomes the next week’s opening cash.
| Week ending | Opening ₹ Confirmed in ₹ | Scenario in ₹ | Total out ₹ | Closing ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| 8 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 11 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 13 |
| Week / trigger | Primary uncer Cash-floor headroom ₹ tainty | Pre-agreed action Owner / date |
|---|
Working-capital drivers
| Driver | Current | Prior Cause / action |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts receivable ₹ | ||
| Inventory or work in progress ₹ | ||
| Accounts payable ₹ | ||
| Days sales outstanding | ||
| Days inventory outstanding | ||
| Days payables outstanding | ||
| Cash conversion cycle |
Formulas and cautions
- • Weekly closing cash = opening cash + confirmed receipts + chosen scenario receipts − actual or forecast payments.
- • DSO = average trade receivables ÷ credit sales × days in period.
- • DIO = average inventory ÷ cost of sales × days in period.
- • DPO = average trade payables ÷ relevant credit purchases or cost base × days in period.
- • Cash conversion cycle = DSO + DIO − DPO.
- • Runway = unrestricted cash ÷ representative net cash burn per period, only when burn is positive and sufficiently stable. If the business is cash-generative, report runway as not applicable and still forecast shocks.
Use consistent denominators and disclose approximations. A probability-weighted receivable is still not cash. Do not delay wages, taxes, protected customer funds, or essential suppliers unlawfully. Cash flow and free cash flow can contain classification choices, timing effects, factoring, underinvestment, and working-capital manipulation; reconcile to statements and notes.
Decision output and cadence
Choose collect, invoice, renegotiate lawfully, pause spend, change purchase timing, reduce inventory, secure approved funding, or activate the contingency plan. Update weekly, reconcile forecast to actual every cycle, and escalate immediately when a floor, payroll, statutory, debt, or critical-supplier trigger is forecast to be breached.
Shared footer
| Close the loop | Entry |
|---|---|
| Decision | |
| Action | |
| Action owner | |
| Due date | |
| Proof required | |
| Professional reviewer / review date |
Professional review flag: CA or finance review is required for material forecasts, restricted cash, tax reserves, factoring, solvency judgments, and stakeholder reporting. Current official filing and payment dates must be entered from the competent portal; this page never supplies a statutory deadline.
· TABLE p. 28 · FS pp. 20–24 · FS pp. 52–55 · TABLE p. 50. Cash, runway, working-capital linkage, annual-report, and growth- trigger mechanics consolidated.
Tool 15 · Three-Statement Close, Ratios & Red-Flag Review
ReconUse this after each accounting close and before trusting a narrative. cile the statements, read the notes, then ask what changed and why.
Shared header
| Owner | Entity / project | Version | As-of date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence links or docu | |||
| ment locations | Last review Next | review | Input legend used □ F □ A □ Fc |
Purpose and when to use
Complete monthly for management accounts and for every annual report or audited package you rely upon. The tool joins balance sheet, income statement, cash-flow statement, notes, ratios, and red flags. It is an analytical close checklist, not a replacement for books, accounting standards, audit, or professional judgment.
Close and evidence checklist
| Area | Reconciled source / note Prepared / reviewed | Exception and owner |
|---|---|---|
| Bank, payment gateways, and petty cash | ||
| Revenue, credits, refunds, and deferred items | ||
| Receivables and expected collectability | ||
| Purchases, payables, accruals, and cut-off | ||
| Inventory / work in progress | ||
| Payroll, benefits, and reimbursements | ||
| Taxes and statutory balances |
| Area | Reconciled source / note Prepared / reviewed | Exception and owner |
|---|---|---|
| Debt, interest, security, and covenants | ||
| Fixed assets, depreciation, and impairment | ||
| Owner, related-party, and intercompany entries | ||
| Provisions, contingencies, and subsequent events |
Three-statement linkage tests
| Test | Calculated ₹ | Difference / explana Reported ₹ tion |
|---|---|---|
| Assets = liabilities + equity | ||
| Opening cash + CFO + | ||
| CFI + CFF = closing cash | ||
| Closing retained earnings bridge | ||
| Debt opening + draws er = closing debt − principal paid ± oth | ||
| Opening net book value + additions − posals − depreciation/ carrying amount of disted revaluations, FX, or impairment ± permitother adjustments = closing net book value |
Retained-earnings bridge = opening retained earnings + net income − distributions ± prior-period or other permitted adjustments. Every adjustment needs a cited note. Period comparison and ratios
| Measure | Current Prior / plan Definition and interpretation |
|---|---|
| Revenue growth | |
| Gross margin | |
| Operating margin | |
| Current ratio | |
| Quick ratio |
| Measure | Current Prior / plan Definition and interpretation |
|---|---|
| Interest-bearing debt / equity | |
| Interest coverage | |
| Operating cash conversion | |
| Return on assets / equity, if meaningful |
Formula card
- • Gross margin = (revenue − cost of sales) ÷ revenue.
- • Operating margin = operating profit ÷ revenue.
- • Current ratio = current assets ÷ current liabilities.
- • Quick ratio = (cash + eligible short-term investments + eligible receivables) ÷ current liabilities.
- • Debt/equity = interest-bearing debt ÷ equity. Do not silently substitute total liabilities.
- • Interest coverage = consistently defined operating earnings, often EBIT, ÷ interest expense.
- • Operating cash conversion = cash from operations ÷ net income, interpreted over multiple periods with notes.
- • Return on assets = net income ÷ average total assets; return on equity = net income ÷ average equity.
Red-flag review
| Signal | Evidence / note | Benign explanation tested? | Action / reviewer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit rises while operating cash persistently weakens | |||
| Receivables, inventory, or contract assets outrun sales | |||
| Payables stretch or collections are factored | |||
| Repeated “one-off” or adjusted items | |||
| Capitalized costs, estimates, or useful lives shift | |||
| Related-party balances or guarantees expand | |||
| Debt, covenant, contingent, or going-concern warning | |||
| Auditor qualification, emphasis, or scope limitation |
Cautions, decision output, and cadence
No ratio has a universal healthy threshold. Compare with the entity’s history, business model, accounting policy, seasonality, covenants, and genuinely comparable organizations. Cash flow is not manipulation-proof. A balanced equation proves arithmetic balance, not economic truth. Read the notes, accounting policies, auditor report, and subsequent events.
Choose close; reopen named account; investigate; correct; escalate to auditor or board; or do not rely on the statements. Run monthly, quarterly in depth, and whenever an annual report, financing package, acquisition, covenant test, or material correction is considered.
Shared footer
| Close the loop | Entry |
|---|---|
| Decision | |
| Action | |
| Action owner | |
| Due date | |
| Proof required | |
| Professional reviewer / review date |
Professional review flag: CA or auditor review is required for accounting policy, tax, assurance, corrections, covenants, solvency, valuation, and external reporting. Use the accounting framework and official filings applicable to the entity and period; do not import a US GAAP or public-company convention by habit.
· FS p. 7 · FS pp. 20–27 · FS pp. 52–55 · EF pp. 70–82. Reading order, statement linkage, ratios, annual-report routine, and red- flag mechanics consolidated and corrected.
Tool 16 · Deal Qualification & Pipeline Scorecard
Use this after discovery to decide where sales time belongs. Unknown is not a soft yes, and activity is not progress without a customer commitment.
Shared header
| Owner | Entity / project | Version | As-of date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence links or docu | |||
| ment locations | Last review Next | review | Input legend used □ F □ A □ Fc |
Purpose and when to use
Complete after each material customer interaction and review the whole pipeline weekly. The scorecard tests fit, pain, priority, people, process, proof, and a mutual next step. It reduces storytelling around famous logos and large theoretical deal values. Discovery detail stays in Tool 11; trade terms and contract risk stay in Tool 17.
Opportunity record
| Field | Entry / evidence |
|---|---|
| Account / opportunity / segment | |
| Problem, trigger, and measured consequence | |
| Proposed outcome, scope, and proof | |
| User, champion, buyer, approver, and blockers | |
| Budget source and competing priority | |
| Decision criteria, process, and target date | |
| Technical, security, privacy, legal, and procurement gates | |
| Current alternative and competitors | |
| Customer-owned next commitment / date |
| Field | Entry / evidence |
|---|---|
| Our next commitment / owner / date |
Evidence score
Predefine weights for your motion; weights total 100%. Rate each criterion 0 unknown or contradicted; 1 asserted but unverified; 2 verified by behavior, artifact, or responsible stakeholder.
| Criterion | Weight % | Rating 0–2 Evidence link / gap |
|---|---|---|
| Ideal-customer and use-case fit | ||
| Material problem and consequence | ||
| Priority / change trigger | ||
| Access to buyer and users | ||
| Decision process and date | ||
| Commercial ability and budget route | ||
| Solution, implementation, and proof fit | ||
| Customer-owned next commitment |
Qualification score = Σ(weight × rating) ÷ 2 = ______%. A failed non-negotiable gate overrides the average.
Pipeline roll-up
| Evidence | Next customer commit |
|---|---|
| Opportunity stage Amount ₹ Chosen probability Decision date | ment |
Formulas and cautions
- • Weighted pipeline = Σ(opportunity amount × evidence-based probability).
- • Stage conversion = opportunities entering the next stage ÷ eligible opportunities entering the current stage for a comparable cohort.
- • Win rate = won opportunities ÷ decided opportunities; report no-decisions separately.
- • Sales-cycle length = decision date − agreed opportunity-start date.
Weighted pipeline is a planning convention, not cash and not expected revenue when probabilities are arbitrary or outcomes correlated. Derive stage probabilities from comparable outcomes where data permits; otherwise label assumptions. Do not inflate amount with unapproved expansion, extend close dates without a trigger, or keep dead deals to protect morale.
Decision output and cadence
Choose advance; hold for a dated trigger; nurture outside active pipeline; disqualify cleanly; or collect one named fact. Define your own stage and score gates from the sales motion and win/loss evidence; there is no universal pipeline coverage target. Update after each interaction and run a weekly removal-and-resource review. Shared footer
| Close the loop | Entry |
|---|---|
| Decision | |
| Action | |
| Action owner | |
| Due date | |
| Proof required | |
| Professional reviewer / review date |
Professional review flag: Ordinary qualification needs no external professional. Bring in authorized technical, security, privacy, finance, legal, procurement, or sector reviewers before representing compliance, approving non-standard terms, or processing protected customer information.
· SALES pp. 9–13 · SALES p. 33 · SALES pp. 24–25. Qualification, funnel, mutual-action, closing, and handoff mechanics consolidated; score weights and gates remain organization-specific.
Tool 17 · Negotiation & Contract Trade Grid
Use this before exchanging terms. Make interests, authority, alternatives, and lawful trades visible before urgency turns every concession into price.
Shared header
| Owner | Entity / project | Version | As-of date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence links or docu | |||
| ment locations | Last review Next | review | Input legend used □ □ □ F A Fc |
Purpose and when to use
Complete before a commercial negotiation, major renewal, employment package, supplier commitment, or non-standard contract. It protects the difference between a target, a reservation boundary, and a BATNA—the best lawful alternative if no agreement is reached. Standing ownership and founder governance belong in Tool 19.
Preparation and authority
| Field | Our side Counterpart—evidence, not mind-reading |
|---|---|
| Interests and pressures | |
| Target outcome | |
| Reservation boundary / walk condition | |
| BATNA and cost to execute it | |
| Worst plausible no-deal outcome | |
| Decision-maker and approval authority | |
| Timing and information asymmetry |
Trade grid
| Issue | Priority | Target / limit | Low-cost give | Required get / condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope / service level tim | ||||
| Price / payment ing | ||||
| Term / volume / renewal | ||||
| Acceptance / warranty | ||||
| Data / IP / confidentiality | ||||
| Liability / indemnity / insurance | ||||
| Exit / transition / dispute |
Concession ledger
| They asked / | Conditional and | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence offered | We gave | We received | recorded? |
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 |
Four contract questions
| Question | Plain-language answer / clause location |
|---|---|
| What exactly must each party do? | |
| By when, and how is acceptance shown? | |
| What is paid, when, and with what tax / adjustment? | |
| What happens if performance, payment, data, or relationship fails? |
Formula and cautions
Expected scenario value = Σ(probability of each scenario × that scenario’s measurable value) − transaction and implementation costs. Use only for commensurable outcomes; rights, safety, reputation, and irreversible harm need explicit gates, not a forced rupee value.
Never concede without naming what changes in return. Discounts may alter scope, term, payment timing, risk, support, and future reference value. A signed commercial summary is not a sufficient legal review. Silence, intimidation, artificial deadlines, and ambiguous authority are risk signals, not tactics you must imitate.
Decision output and cadence
Choose agree within authority; exchange a conditional trade; revise; pause for evidence or approval; use the BATNA; or walk away. Update after each round and before any redline or signature. Compare the final document with the agreed trade grid, not with memory.
Shared footer
| Close the loop | Entry |
|---|---|
| Decision | |
| Action | |
| Action owner | |
| Due date | |
| Proof required | |
| Professional reviewer / review date | regu |
Professional review flag: A qualified lawyer must review material, unfamiliar, cross-border, lated, employment, data, IP, liability, financing, or property terms. A CA should review tax and financial consequences. Verify current law and authority; this grid is not a contract.
· SALES p. 27 · SALES pp. 28–32 · TABLE p. 7 · ASC p. 136. BATNA, trade, concession, hardball-response, discount, and four- question contract mechanics consolidated.
Tool 18 · Capital, Dilution & Funding Decision Pack
Use this before raising or accepting capital. Name the milestone, compare the no-funding path, and model control as well as headline valuation.
Shared header
| Owner | Entity / project | Version | As-of date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence links or docu | |||
| ment locations | Last review Next | review | Input legend used □ F □ A □ Fc |
Purpose and when to use
Complete before debt, equity, convertible, grant, strategic capital, founder infusion, or a decision to remain internally funded. The pack asks what the money buys, how long it lasts, what rights travel with it, and what happens if the next milestone is late. It does not value the company or interpret an instrument without professional advice.
Need, use, and milestone
| Question | Answer / evidence | F / A / Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Amount and latest safe receipt date | ||
| Specific uses and protected reserve | ||
| Measurable milestone purchased | ||
| Months / weeks of runway to milestone | ||
| Downside if milestone is late or missed | ||
| No-funding / smaller-scope path | ||
| Why this source fits the cash-flow and risk |
Source comparison
| Cash amount / tim | Ownership / control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path | ing | Cash cost | effect | Failure consequence |
| Internal cash / slower plan | ||||
| Customer or operating finance | ||||
| Debt | ||||
| Equity | ||||
| Convertible / other— professional model |
Terms that move economics or control
| Term | Proposed Downside / interaction | Reviewer question |
|---|---|---|
| Valuation / price / interest / fees | ||
| Instrument, seniority, security | ||
| Option pool or reserved equity | ||
| Conversion / discount / cap | ||
| Liquidation / redemption / repayment | ||
| Voting, board, veto, and information rights | ||
| Founder vesting / lock-in / leaver | ||
| Covenants, warranties, and conditions |
Simple priced-round cap-table model
| Holder / | % post fully | di | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pool | Units pre | % pre | New units | Units post | luted |
| Total | 100% | 100% |
Formulas and cautions
- • Post-money valuation = pre-money valuation + new equity investment.
- • In a simple priced round, new investor ownership = investment ÷ post-money valuation.
- • Holder’s post-round percentage = holder’s post-round fully diluted units ÷ total post-round fully diluted units.
- • Dilution of percentage ownership = 1 − (post-round percentage ÷ pre-round percentage), when comparing the same holder and rights basis.
These simple formulas do not model option-pool timing, multiple share classes, convertibles, accrued interest, anti-dilution, liquidation preferences, taxes, foreign ownership, or control rights. A higher valuation can carry worse terms. Model downside proceeds and future rounds with counsel; never sign from this page.
Decision output and cadence
Choose remain internally funded; reduce need; use named source; negotiate named terms; seek competing terms; or stop. Review before outreach, at each term-sheet revision, before approval, and after close against actual use and milestone evidence.
Shared footer
| Close the loop | Entry |
|---|---|
| Decision | |
| Action | |
| Action owner | |
| Due date | |
| Proof required | |
| Professional reviewer / review date |
Professional review flag: Mandatory lawyer, Company Secretary, and CA review; add an authorized dealer, valuation professional, sector adviser, or other regulated reviewer when applicable. Use current MCA, RBI, SEBI, tax, FEMA, Companies Act, grant, and instrument documents on the transaction date.
· TABLE pp. 56–59 · TABLE pp. 66–67 · EF pp. 84–91 · FS pp. 23–24. Funding-source, debt/equity, dilution, cash-linkage, and milestone mechanics consolidated; legal instrument detail requires current review.